Industry Reports

Pet Wearables Market Size: $3.69B in 2024

Pet wearables hit $3.69B in 2024, growing ~14% CAGR, with Tractive, Fi, Halo, and Pawfit competing for connected-pet owners.

By Scott Zhu September 16, 2026 7 min read
Pet Wearables Market Size: $3.69B in 2024

Pet wearables reached $3.69B in 2024 and are growing at roughly 14% CAGR (Brandark / Fortune, 2024), led by GPS trackers and health monitors from Tractive, Fi, Halo, and Pawfit. Subscription connectivity—not hardware—decides the winners, as Tractive’s 2025 Whistle acquisition confirms.

pet wearables market explained

The pet wearables market hit $3.69B in 2024 and is compounding near 14% annually (Brandark / Fortune, 2024), making it one of the fastest-growing pet-tech segments. The category spans GPS trackers, activity monitors, and health sensors, with Tractive, Fi, Halo, and Pawfit as the leading names. This article covers the size, the players, the subscription economics, and the 2025 consolidation wave.

How big is the pet wearables market?

Pet wearables reached approximately $3.69B in 2024 with a ~14% CAGR (Brandark / Fortune, 2024). Wearables outpace many mature food categories (global pet food ~4.2% CAGR to 2034, IMARC, 2025) because they ride the same connectivity trend as human fitness devices.

The category includes GPS location trackers, activity/calorie monitors, and emerging health sensors (heart rate, respiration, pain indices). Growth is concentrated in North America and Europe, with Asia rising as smartphone penetration and pet spend climb (APAC pet care ~$42.16B in 2024, Market Data Forecast, 2024).

Is 14% CAGR sustainable?

Likely yes for several years, barring hardware-commoditization. The subscription model (below) creates recurring revenue that stabilizes the category and funds R&D, supporting double-digit growth through the decade.

Who are the key players?

The leading names are Tractive (Austrian subscription-GPS leader, €100M+ ARR, ~60% subscription, 1.4M active users, LinkedIn Tractive, 2025), Fi (US GPS + LTE-M collar, ~$149+ and $19/mo, owner forums, 2025), Halo (virtual-fence training collar), and Pawfit (UK/EU tracker). Each blends hardware with a monthly connectivity plan.

Tractive’s 2025 acquisition of Mars’ Whistle (LinkedIn Tractive / Brandark, 2025) consolidated the field, adding a legacy US pioneer to Tractive’s subscription base and broadening North American scale.

How did Whistle fit in?

Whistle was an early connected-pet pioneer later owned by Mars; Tractive’s purchase moved it to a purpose-built subscription operator (LinkedIn Tractive / Brandark, 2025). The deal illustrates that scale and recurring revenue—not one-off hardware sales—decide outcomes.

Why do subscriptions win in wearables?

A GPS tracker is useless without a cellular or LTE-M link, so the device is a gateway to a monthly fee. Tractive’s ~60% subscription-revenue mix (LinkedIn Tractive, 2025) and Fi’s ~$19/mo plan (owner forums, 2025) show the norm: sell or subsidize hardware, then earn ARR.

This model is more durable than hardware margin alone and rewards focused operators over conglomerates. It also explains why Mars divested Whistle—hardware margins are thin inside a food giant.

What features differentiate brands?

Battery life (Fi advertises ~30 days, owner forums, 2025), location accuracy, escape/gps fences, and health metrics separate the field. Newer entrants add AI: PetPace 2.0 includes a patented pain index (LinkedIn PetPace, 2025), and Invoxia Minitailz tracks heart rate and respiration (LinkedIn Invoxia, 2025).

How does PETKIT relate to wearables?

PETKIT is primarily smart-litter and feeders (CES 2025/2026 winner, LinkedIn PETKIT, 2025) rather than GPS, but the same connected-home logic applies. The broader point: Chinese hardware firms (PETKIT) and subscription specialists (Tractive, Fi) are both capturing pet-tech share as the category professionalizes.

Is there geopolitical risk?

Yes. About 66% of pet firms have China supply-chain exposure (Global PETS, 2025), and US tariffs lifted average exposure from ~6% to ~35%. Hardware brands reliant on Chinese manufacturing may face margin pressure, though most wearables assemble regionally for connectivity compliance.

What does 2025 M&A signal?

Petfood Industry logged 8+ mid-size pet deals in 2025 (Petfood Industry, 2025), and wearables saw Tractive–Whistle. With the category at $3.69B and growing 14% (Brandark / Fortune, 2024), sub-scale hardware brands face pressure to merge—more consolidation is likely.

Could a food or retail giant re-enter hardware?

Mars exited Whistle, but Chewy’s clinic and membership push (18 clinics, Chewy+ at 3% of sales, LinkedIn Chewy, 2025) shows platforms want the pet relationship. A retailer could bundle a white-label tracker, though none has announced one.

What product categories make up wearables?

Wearables split into GPS location trackers (the largest, safety-led), activity and calorie monitors (wellness-led), and health sensors (heart rate, respiration, pain indices). Newer devices fuse these: Invoxia Minitailz tracks heart rate, respiration, activity, and calories with alerts (LinkedIn Invoxia, 2025), while PetPace 2.0 adds a patented pain index (LinkedIn PetPace, 2025).

Why are health sensors the next frontier?

As owners humanize pets (43.6% prioritize pet-food health over their own, Pride and Groom, 2025), continuous health data becomes a selling point beyond lost-pet recovery. Sensors that flag early illness can reduce vet bills and support telehealth (vet telehealth $20.5B, 25.1% CAGR, Global Market Insights, 2025).

How do buyers choose a wearable?

Key criteria: battery life (Fi advertises ~30 days, owner forums, 2025), location accuracy, virtual-fence features, and health metrics. Subscription cost matters—Fi charges ~$19/mo (owner forums, 2025) and Tractive runs ~60% subscription revenue (LinkedIn Tractive, 2025). Buyers should match features to the pet’s risk (escape-prone dogs need GPS; seniors may benefit from health sensors).

Are cheap ECG collars trustworthy?

Reddit communities warn that inexpensive ECG/”heart-rate” collars are often inaccurate and disconnect outdoors, bordering on scam (owner forums, 2025). Owners should favor established brands with validated sensors over no-name discount devices.

What is the 2025–2030 outlook?

At $3.69B and ~14% CAGR (Brandark / Fortune, 2024), wearables should keep outpacing pet food (~4.2%, IMARC, 2025). The Tractive–Whistle consolidation (LinkedIn Tractive / Brandark, 2025) may trigger more M&A among sub-scale brands, while AI health features deepen the category’s value beyond location.

What could slow wearables?

Tariffs and China supply-chain exposure (~66% of pet firms, Global PETS, 2025) pressure hardware margins; privacy concerns about constant location tracking are a softer headwind. Neither is likely to halt double-digit growth, but both shape pricing and positioning.

How do wearables connect to telehealth and insurance?

Wearable data feeds vet telehealth platforms (PetPace, Invoxia links above), enabling remote monitoring that reduces clinic load amid the 243 vet shortage areas (AVMA / Richmond SPCA, 2025). Insurers may eventually discount premiums for tracked pets, mirroring human health-insurance incentives. That triangulation—wearable + telehealth + insurance—is the category’s long-term upside.

Could a retailer launch a white-label tracker?

Possibly. Chewy’s clinic and membership push (18 clinics, Chewy+ at 3% of sales, LinkedIn Chewy, 2025) shows platforms want the pet relationship; a white-label tracker bundled with insurance or telehealth is a logical extension, though none has been announced.

What should first-time buyers know?

Start with the use case: lost-pet safety argues for GPS; wellness curiosity argues for activity tracking; senior health argues for sensors. Confirm cellular coverage in your area, budget for the subscription, and read owner reviews on battery and app reliability. The $3.69B market (Brandark / Fortune, 2024) offers mature options, so avoid unproven discount brands.

The bottom line for wearable buyers

At $3.69B and ~14% CAGR (Brandark / Fortune, 2024), wearables are a durable growth story where recurring connectivity—not the device—decides winners, as Tractive’s ~60% subscription mix (LinkedIn Tractive, 2025) and Fi’s ~$19/mo plan (owner forums, 2025) show. For buyers, match the device to the use case: GPS for escape risk, health sensors for seniors, activity tracking for wellness curiosity—and avoid no-name ECG collars flagged as inaccurate (owner forums, 2025). The category’s long-term upside is triangulation with telehealth (vet telehealth $20.5B, 25.1% CAGR, Global Market Insights, 2025) and insurance, where wearable data could eventually lower premiums. Tariffs and China supply-chain exposure (~66% of pet firms, Global PETS, 2025) are the main margin headwinds.

Related reading

FAQ

Q: How big is the pet wearables market?
A: Pet wearables reached $3.69B in 2024 and are growing at roughly 14% CAGR (Brandark / Fortune, 2024).

Q: Who are the leading wearable brands?
A: Tractive, Fi, Halo, and Pawfit lead, spanning GPS trackers and health monitors; Tractive acquired Whistle from Mars in 2025 (LinkedIn Tractive / Brandark, 2025).

Q: Why is the subscription model important?
A: GPS needs a cellular link, so hardware is a gateway to recurring fees—Tractive runs ~60% subscription revenue (LinkedIn Tractive, 2025) and Fi charges ~$19/mo (owner forums, 2025).

Q: How fast is the market growing versus pet food?
A: Wearables grow ~14% CAGR vs pet food’s ~4.2% (IMARC, 2025), reflecting the human fitness-device trend.

Q: What risks face wearables?
A: Tariffs and China supply-chain exposure (~66% of pet firms, Global PETS, 2025) pressure hardware margins; consolidation is likely given 8+ 2025 pet deals (Petfood Industry, 2025).

Sources

  • Brandark / Fortune (2024): Pet wearables $3.69B in 2024, ~14% CAGR.
  • LinkedIn Tractive (2025): €100M+ ARR, ~60% subscription, 1.4M active users; acquired Whistle from Mars.
  • LinkedIn Tractive / Brandark (2025): Tractive–Whistle 2025 acquisition.
  • owner forums (2025): Fi collar ~$149+ with $19/mo LTE-M, ~30-day battery.
  • IMARC (2025): Global pet food ~$136.6B, ~4.2% CAGR to 2034.
  • Market Data Forecast (2024): APAC pet care ~$42.16B, 6.01% CAGR.
  • Global PETS (2025): ~66% of pet firms have China supply-chain exposure; tariffs ~6% to ~35%.
  • LinkedIn PETKIT (2025): CES 2025/2026 wins; 2022 revenue >¥1B.
  • LinkedIn PetPace (2025): PetPace 2.0 pain-index AI collar.
  • LinkedIn Invoxia (2025): Minitailz heart-rate/respiration tracker.
  • Petfood Industry (2025): 8+ mid-size pet M&A deals in 2025.
  • LinkedIn Chewy (2025): 18 clinics; Chewy+ at 3% of sales.

Scott Zhu
Scott Zhu Founder, GlobalPetIndex

Senior researcher at GlobalPetIndex, tracking pet business strategy, M&A and brand intelligence.

💬AI Chat
GPI

GlobalPetIndex

Open the app for a smoother experience

Open Privacy